// DARKOAPP / GLOSSARY

The vocabulary.

The named patterns of modern relational power. Each one has a source — a framework that named it, tested it, and made it readable. Learn the names and the moves stop being a panic.

Anxious attachment
01
Anxious attachment is a relational style in which closeness feels uncertain by default, so the nervous system stays on alert for signs of withdrawal and pushes to re-secure connection at the first hint of distance.
▸ John Bowlby & Mary Ainsworth — attachment theory (1958-1978) →
Avoidant attachment
02
Avoidant attachment is a relational style in which emotional closeness registers as a threat to autonomy, so the nervous system reflexively pulls away whenever a partner moves toward greater intimacy.
▸ John Bowlby & Mary Ainsworth — attachment theory (1958-1978) →
Benching
03
Benching is keeping a romantic option in reserve — enough sporadic contact to stop them leaving, never enough investment to make them a partner — so they stay available as a backup while you keep pursuing what you actually want.
▸ Greene Law 20 (do not commit to anyone) →
Breadcrumbing
04
Breadcrumbing is the pattern of sending intermittent, low-effort signals of interest — a like, a one-word reply, a "hey stranger" after weeks of silence — with no intention of letting the relationship actually progress.
▸ Greene Law 16 (use absence) + Cialdini scarcity →
DARVO
05
DARVO is a four-step reversal — Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender — used by someone confronted with their own behavior to flip the conversation so the person raising the issue ends up apologizing for raising it.
▸ Jennifer Freyd (1997) — coined to describe perpetrator responses to confrontation →
Dry texting
06
Dry texting is a pattern of short, low-effort replies — one word, no questions back, minimal engagement — that reads as disinterest but can come from at least three very different causes.
▸ Avoidant deactivation (Bowlby) read against frame asymmetry (Greene) →
Fawn Response
07
Fawning is a trauma response in which a person defuses perceived threat by appeasing, pleasing, and merging with the other person's wants — abandoning their own needs to stay safe through agreement.
▸ The fourth threat response (fight/flight/freeze/fawn) read through attachment and appeasement →
Fearful-avoidant attachment
08
Fearful-avoidant attachment is a relational style that runs both alarms at once — the system craves closeness and codes closeness as danger, so it pursues a partner and then flees the very connection it just chased.
▸ John Bowlby attachment theory; Main & Solomon (disorganized classification, 1986); Bartholomew & Horowitz four-category model (1991) →
Future faking
09
Future faking is the tactic of selling a vivid shared future — the trip, the move-in, the ring — to extract real commitment in the present, with no intention of building the thing being promised.
▸ Cialdini commitment & consistency + Greene Law 32 (play to fantasies) →
Gaslighting
10
Gaslighting is a sustained pattern of denying, reframing, and rewriting events so that the target gradually stops trusting their own memory, perception, and judgment.
▸ Patrick Hamilton's play "Gas Light" (1938) + modern clinical use (Stern, 2007) →
Ghosting
11
Ghosting is the sudden, total end of contact — no argument, no explanation, no closing message — leaving the other person to infer the ending from silence alone.
▸ Greene Law 16 (use absence to increase respect and honor), weaponized, read through avoidant deactivation (Bowlby) →
Ghostlighting
12
Ghostlighting is ghosting someone and then, when they resurface or confront it, denying or minimizing that any distance happened at all — fusing the disappearance of ghosting with the reality-denial of gaslighting.
▸ Ghosting (absence as exit) fused with gaslighting (reality-editing) →
Hoovering
13
Hoovering is the return move — a sudden flood of warmth, apology, or nostalgia from someone you cut off or pulled away from, engineered to vacuum you back into a dynamic you had already started to leave.
▸ Greene Law 39 (stir up waters to catch fish) + intermittent reinforcement →
Love bombing
14
Love bombing is an early flood of intense affection, attention, and future-talk — delivered fast enough and heavy enough that the target bonds to the intensity before they have any evidence the person behind it is consistent.
▸ Greene Law 32 (play to fantasies) →
Mixed signals
15
Mixed signals are the pattern of warm and cold behavior arriving close enough together that neither reading of the relationship — interested or not — ever gets to be the settled one.
▸ Anxious-avoidant cycle (Bowlby) + intermittent reinforcement (Skinner) →
Monkey Branching
16
Monkey branching is lining up a new relationship before letting go of the current one — swinging from one partner to the next like branches, so there is never a moment of hanging without a grip.
▸ Option-hoarding / security-seeking read through avoidance of being alone →
Orbiting
17
Orbiting is when someone who has gone quiet on you in private keeps consuming you in public — watching every story, liking the old photo, reacting without ever replying — staying in your orbit without re-entering the conversation.
▸ Intermittent reinforcement (Skinner) + Greene Law 16 (use absence) →
Silent Treatment
18
The silent treatment is the deliberate withholding of communication — refusing to speak, reply, or acknowledge someone — used to punish, control, or extract compliance while avoiding open conflict.
▸ Greene Law 4 (always say less than necessary), inverted into punishment; read against Gottman's stonewalling →
Situationship
19
A situationship is a romantic or sexual involvement that delivers relationship behavior — time, intimacy, routine — while withholding the relationship definition, so one party gets full access at partial commitment and the other carries hope as the unpaid balance.
▸ Greene Law 32 (play to people's fantasies) →
Stonewalling
20
Stonewalling is the act of shutting down inside a conversation — going silent, going cold, refusing to engage — as a way of refusing to negotiate while still occupying the room.
▸ Gottman's Four Horsemen (#4) + Greene Law 4 (always say less than necessary), weaponized →
The four horsemen
21
The four horsemen are the four communication patterns John Gottman identified as the strongest predictors of relationship failure: criticism, contempt, defensiveness, and stonewalling.
▸ John Gottman — Love Lab longitudinal studies (1970s-present) →
Trauma Bonding
22
A trauma bond is the powerful emotional attachment that forms toward someone who hurts you, built by cycles of abuse alternating with affection so that the relief becomes indistinguishable from love.
▸ Intermittent reinforcement (Skinner/behavioral) read through Bowlby's attachment system →
// no pattern matches that query. Try a broader term.

Stop naming it after the fact.

Share your actual thread in and DarkoApp reads these patterns — and tells you which one is currently being run.

RUN A FREE DECODE →